The Damage Done: Zero Dark Thirty


zeroThere’s a jarring transition early on in Zero Dark Thirty, right as the film begins, in fact.  Over a darkened screen we hear voices from September 11, confused air controllers, overwhelmed emergency operators, panicked civilians. The last is a frightened young woman certain she’s going to die and the 911 operator trying to calm her down, and who is finally met with ominous silence at the other end of the line.  It’s an effective evocation of the events behind the film we’re about to watch, but it also puts us in the headspace to be totally on board with the scene that follows. Because what comes next is a CIA operative torturing a prisoner for information about Al Qaeda.  And since we’ve just been vividly reminded of the horror of 9-11, we’re inclined to see it as not only necessary, but right, just payback for the attack perpetrated on us.  Except Mark Boal and Kathryn Bigelow are smarter than that.  Yes, they want you to feel that momentary sense of vengeance.  And then feel bad for having done so.

That’s what all the hand-wringing over the depiction of torture in this film seems to overlook.  It doesn’t flinch from that depiction, but it also doesn’t shy away from showing the collateral damage it causes, both physical and emotional.  In a way, Zero Dark Thirty is a companion piece to Steven Spielberg’s Munich, in that both ask if a proportionate response to a reprehensible act does nothing but lead to more reprehensible acts.  Which is exactly what plays out in the early going of Zero Dark Thirty.  Prisoners are taken and tortured, more terrorist acts ensue, more prisoners are taken, more attacks ensue.  It’s a cycle that wears down those who are part of it, the torturer as well as the tortured.  One CIA operative wearily talks about wanting to go and do something normal for a while.  And Jessica Chastain’s Maya eventually loses her initial revulsion at the treatment of the prisoners as she becomes more and more obsessed with finding bin Laden.  She’s worn down to the point where, when she finally see bin Laden’s body, she can manage nothing more than a numb nod, and later, tears.

It’s this focus on Maya that, surprisingly, makes the actual raid on bin Laden’s compound feel a little bit like a thematic misstep.  From a simple storytelling perspective, we’re suddenly introduced to a whole new batch of characters who come in and take over the film for a good forty minutes.  That’s not a bad thing in and of itself, but those characters take us away from Maya.  It makes that moment when she finally see bin Laden feel a little less weighty, since we’ve just watched the entire mission unfold.  We’re taken out of Maya’s point of view and placed into a Call of Duty mission.  Make no mistake, it’s incredibly tense and well done, but it almost feels like a nod to the crowd who were upset they didn’t get a wolf fight at the end of The Grey.  A film about the hunt for bin Laden has to have its money shot.  It’s nothing that kills the film; I just think staying with Maya so that the first time we see bin Laden’s body is the first time she sees it would have made for a much more powerful moment.

Another thing the torture controversy misses is that the information gained from it in the film pales next to that gathered by good old-fashioned surveillance work.  The torture gets them a name, yes, but it’s a new staffer finding an old photo that puts them on the right track.  It’s eyes on the street who detect the patterns that lead to bin Laden’s compound.  It’s spy satellites — and the intelligence to read their images properly — that eventually convince those in charge to proceed with the mission.  Only once the blind passionate response gives way to the cooler, more analytic approach are any real results achieved.  And at a far less brutal cost to all involved.

There’s a great ambiguity to the tears Maya sheds at the end of the film.  Are they for the friends lost?  The compromising lengths gone to in the pursuit?  The realization that the focus of the last decade of her life is gone? The overwhelming sense that all this wasn’t enough?  We’re left to decide for ourselves.  But there’s definitely the sense that the wounds of 9-11 were far too great for even the death of its architect to bandage.  Especially when the steps taken to bring that death about may have wounded us further.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Damage Done: Zero Dark Thirty

  1. Excellent review! I literally cannot wait for Zero Dark Thirty to come out – I’ve had my eye on it now for nearly a couple of months. I like that the beginning of the film does play some of those transcripts and fear in peoples voices because whatever people believe about the events of Zero Dark Thirty and how it “all went down” the fact remains that he killed thousands of people in probably one of the worst ways possible.

  2. I wanted to let you know how awesome it is to see you writing. You bring a great point of view to things . Best of luck 🙂

  3. Pingback: Zero Dark Thirty Review: 50 Shades of Abu Ghraib | Rorschach Reviews

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s